Become Good At Anything

Explore the truth behind the 10,000-hour rule with this advanced ESL lesson featuring vocabulary practice, listening tasks, discussion, and role-plays based on a TED Talk.

Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Develop comprehension skills by identifying main ideas, arguments, and key examples from the TED Talk.

  • Learn and apply advanced vocabulary in speaking, listening, and discussion tasks.

  • Express and defend opinions about specialization vs. sampling through discussion, critical thinking, and a role-play summarizing the talk.

Warmer

Draw a timeline of your life and add three skills/hobbies you tried at different ages. Discuss the following:

  • Which skills/hobbies have you kept
  • Which ones did you drop
  • A skill/hobby you  would like to try 

Answer the following questions.

  1. Do you think starting early always leads to becoming great at something? Why?
  2. Is it better to focus on one skill or try many things first? Why?

Pre-listening

Read the sentences. Brainstorm words that can be use instead of the words in bold. You may have to change word order.
  1. Her progress started to plateau, and she stopped improving even though she continued practicing.

  2. He has a broad range of interests, from physics and drawing to cooking and design.

  3. Everyone noticed how precocious she was when she began reading full novels at age four.

  4. The company introduced bonuses to incentivize employees to finish their projects early.

  5. Her calm, confident response was the quintessential example of strong leadership under pressure.

  6. His explanation didn’t comport with the evidence, so the team questioned his conclusion.

  7. Strong research skills underlie every major scientific discovery.

Video

Listen to each section and match them to the best title.

Listen again and answer the questions.

0:00–0:18
Many of you here have probably heard of the 10,000 hours rule.
It’s the idea that to become great in anything takes 10,000 hours of focused practice. So you’d better get started as early as possible.

0:18–0:31
The poster child for this story is Tiger Woods. His father famously gave him a putter when he was seven months old. Fast forward to the age of 21—he’s the greatest golfer in the world. Quintessential 10,000 hours story.

0:31–1:11
Another is that of the three Polgar sisters, whose father decided to teach them chess in a very technical manner from a very early age.
Two of his daughters went on to become grandmaster chess players.
I got curious: if this 10,000 hours rule is correct, then we should see that elite athletes get a head start in deliberate practice.
And in fact, when scientists study elite athletes, they see that they spend more time in deliberate practice. Not a big surprise. But when they track athletes over time, the pattern looks like this: Future elites tend to have a sampling period, where they try a variety of activities, gain broad skills, and delay specializing longer than peers who plateau earlier.

1:11–1:38
That doesn’t comport with the 10,000 hours rule. So I wondered about other domains, like music. Turns out the pattern is similar. Exceptional musicians didn’t start spending more time in deliberate practice until their third instrument.
They too had a sampling period. Even famously precocious musicians like Yo-Yo Ma.

1:38–2:23
So I explored backgrounds of people I admired. Duke Ellington shunned music lessons to focus on baseball and painting. Mariam Mirzakhani dreamed of being a novelist and later won the Fields Medal. Van Gogh had five different careers before starting to draw in his late 20s. Claude Shannon took a philosophy course that exposed him to binary logic—underlying today’s computers.
Frances Hesselbein took her first professional job at 54 and became CEO of the Girl Scouts.

2:23–2:55
Here’s an athlete I followed. He sampled tennis, skiing, wrestling.
His mother was a tennis coach but refused to train him because he returned balls “wrong.” He tried more sports: handball, volleyball, soccer, badminton, skateboarding. Who is this dabbler? Roger Federer.

2:55–3:38
Why don’t we know his developmental story? Tiger’s story is dramatic and tidy—easy to extrapolate to our own lives. But golf is a uniquely horrible model of human learning. Golf is a “kind” environment: clear goals, unchanging rules, immediate accurate feedback. Chess too. But many domains we live in are “wicked”: unclear goals, shifting rules, delayed or inaccurate feedback.

3:38–4:32
If hyper-specialization isn’t the answer, what is? Sometimes it looks like meandering, zigzagging, getting behind. But research on innovation shows impactful inventions are made by teams that merge ideas from broad fields.
One pioneer was Junpei Yokoi. He scored poorly in electronics, took a low-tier job maintaining machines at a playing-card company—Nintendo.
He combined calculator and credit-card technologies to create handheld games.
His magnum opus: the Game Boy.

4:32–5:20
We don’t incentivize people to follow the Roger path. We push the Tiger path.
But in a wicked world, we need both. Freeman Dyson said ecosystems need birds (big-picture thinkers) and frogs (detail-focused). But we tell everyone to become frogs—short-sighted in today’s world.

Post-listening activity

 Answer the questions 

  1. Do you agree with the idea that early specialization is overrated? Why?

  2. Is “sampling” different activities beneficial in adulthood, or only in childhood?

  3. What skill or hobby did you try unexpectedly that later helped you?

  4. Do you consider yourself more of a “bird” (broad thinker) or a “frog” (detail-focused)?

  5. In your culture, are people encouraged to follow the Tiger path or the Federer path?

Role A: (Host) You are the host of a popular podcast. You’ve invited student B onto your show to discuss their research. 

  • Use the text and write down questions you can ask related to the podcast.

Role B:  (Guest) You have been invited onto Student A’s podcast to discuss what you’ve learned about learning skills. 

  • Use the text to help you write down information about your research. 

Take 5 to 10 minutes to prepare for the interview. 

Student/Group A: Build your argument for why early specialization is best for mastering skills.   

 

Student/Group B:  Build your argument for why sampling and broad development are more important for mastering skills. 

Student/group C (If needed): Listen to both sides and choose which argument was stronger.

Take 5 to 10 minutes to prepare for the interview. 

Share

We keep your data private and share your data only with third parties that make this service possible. Read our Privacy Policy.

More Stories

Prison Break

Prison Break

Networking Disaster

Networking disaster

Behind Closed Doors

Behind closed doors

Mayor of Few Words

The Reserved Mayor